Radiation protection
Free Access
Calculation of effective dose
Cynthia H. McCollough,
Beth A. Schueler,
Cynthia H. McCollough
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Search for more papers by this authorBeth A. Schueler
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Search for more papers by this authorCynthia H. McCollough,
Beth A. Schueler,
Cynthia H. McCollough
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Search for more papers by this authorBeth A. Schueler
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The concept of “effective dose” was introduced in 1975 to provide a mechanism for assessing the radiation detriment from partial body irradiations in terms of data derived from whole body irradiations. The effective dose is the mean absorbed dose from a uniform whole-body irradiation that results in the same total radiation detriment as from the nonuniform, partial-body irradiation in question. The effective dose is calculated as the weighted average of the mean absorbed dose to the various body organs and tissues, where the weighting factor is the radiation detriment for a given organ (from a whole-body irradiation) as a fraction of the total radiation detriment. In this review, effective dose equivalent and effective dose, as established by the International Commission on Radiological Protection in 1977 and 1990, respectively, are defined and various methods of calculating these quantities are presented for radionuclides, radiography, fluoroscopy, computed tomography and mammography. In order to calculate either quantity, it is first necessary to estimate the radiation dose to individual organs. One common method of determining organ doses is through Monte Carlo simulations of photon interactions within a simplified mathematical model of the human body. Several groups have performed these calculations and published their results in the form of data tables of organ dose per unit activity or exposure. These data tables are specified according to particular examination parameters, such as radiopharmaceutical, x-ray projection, x-ray beam energy spectra or patient size. Sources of these organ dose conversion coefficients are presented and differences between them are examined. The estimates of effective dose equivalent or effective dose calculated using these data, although not intended to describe the dose to an individual, can be used as a relative measure of stochastic radiation detriment. The calculated values, in units of sievert (or rem), indicate the amount of whole-body irradiation that would yield the equivalent radiation detriment as the exam in question. In this manner, the detriment associated with partial or organ-specific irradiations, as are common in diagnostic radiology, can be assessed.
REFERENCES
- 1International Commission on Radiological Protection, Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 26 (The International Commission on Radiological Protection, Oxford, 1977).
- 2International Commission on Radiological Protection, Problems Involved in Developing an Index of Harm, ICRP Publication 27 (The International Commission on Radiological Protection, Oxford, 1977).
- 3W. Jacobi, “The concept of effective dose: A proposal for the combination of organ doses,” J. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 12, 101–109 (1975).
- 4National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Recommendations on Limits for Exposure to Ionizing Radiation, NCRP Report No. 90 (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, 1987).
- 5International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 60 (The International Commission on Radiological Protection, New York, NY, 1991).
- 6M. Zankl, N. Petoussi, and G. Drexler, “Effective dose and effective dose equivalent—The impact of the new ICRP definition for external photon irradiation,” Health Phys. 62, 395–399 (1992).
- 7M. Zankl and G. Drexler, “An analysis of the equivalent dose calculation for the remainder tissues,” Health Phys. 69, 346–355 (1995).
- 8G. Drexler, G. Williams, and M. Zankl, “The meaning and the principle of determination of the effective dose equivalent in radiation protection,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 12, 95–100 (1985).
- 9R. Kramer and G. Drexler, “On the calculation of the effective dose equivalent,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 3, 13–24 (1982).
- 10J. H. Trueblood, “Radiation safety: The impact of current regulations and guidelines,” in The Expanding Role of Medical Physics in Diagnostic Imaging, edited by G. D. Frey and P. Sprawls (Advanced Medical Publishing, Madison, WI, 1997), pp. 423–443.
- 11G. A. Carlsson and C. A. Carlsson, “Relations between effective dose equivalent and mean absorbed dose (energy imparted) to patients in diagnostic radiology,” Phys. Med. Biol. 31, 911–921 (1986).
- 12National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Limits of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation, NCRP Report No. 116 (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, 1993).
- 13G. Drexler et al., “Effective dose—how effective for patients?,” Radia. Environ. Biophys. 32, 209–219 (1993).
- 14X. G. Xu and W. D. Reece, “Sex-specific tissue weighting factors for effective dose equivalent calculations,” Health Phys. 70, 81–86 (1996).
- 15D. Beninson and D. Sowby, “Age and sex dependent weighting factors for medical irradiation,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 11, 57–60 (1985).
- 16National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Risk Estimates for Radiation Protection, NCRP Report No. 115 (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, 1993).
- 17W. K. Sinclair, “The concept of effective dose,” Health Phys. 66, 586 (1994).
- 18International Commission on Radiological Protection, Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals., ICRP Publication 53 (International Commission on Radiological Protection, Oxford, 1987).
- 19United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), Ionizing Radiation: Sources and Biological Effects (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, New York, 1982).
- 20United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, New York, 1988).
- 21W. Huda and G. A. Sandison, “Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando phantom measurements,” Health Phys. 47, 463–467 (1984).
- 22W. S. Synder et al., “Estimates of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom.,” J. Nucl. Med. 10, (1969).
- 23International Commission on Radiological Protection, Report of the Task Group on Reference Man, ICRP Publication 23 (The International Commission on Radiological Protection, Oxford, 1975).
- 24M. G. Stabin, J. B. Stubbs, and R. E. Toohey, Radiation Dose Estimates from Radiopharmaceuticals, NUREG/CR-6345 (Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, 1996).
- 25M. Cristy and K. Eckerman, Specific Absorbed Fractions of Energy at Various Ages from Internal Photon Sources. Parts I-VII., ORNL/TM-8381/V1-V7 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 1987).
- 26M. Rosenstein, Organ Doses in Diagnostic Radiology, HEW publication FDA 76-8030 (U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Bureau of Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, 1976).
- 27M. Rosenstein and L. W. Anderson, Handbook of Selected Organ Doses for Projections Common in Diagnostic Radiology, HEW publication FDA 76-8031 (U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Bureau of Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, 1976).
- 28M. Rosenstein, Handbook of Selected Tissue Doses for Projections Common in Diagnostic Radiology, HHS Publication FDA 89-8031 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, 1988).
- 29M. Rosenstein, T. J. Beck, and G. G. Warner, Handbook of Selected Organ Doses for Projections Common in Pediatric Radiology, HEW publication FDA 79-8079 (U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Bureau of Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, 1979).
- 30L. E. Peterson and M. Rosenstein, CDI3: Computer program for tissue doses in diagnostic radiology (for VAX and IBM-compatible PC systems) (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, 1989).
- 31M. Rosenstein et al., Handbook of Selected Tissue Doses for the Upper Gastrointestinal Fluoroscopic Examination, HHS Publication FDA 92-8282 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, 1992).
- 32O. H. Suleiman et al., “Tissue doses in the upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy examination,” Radiology 178, 653–658 (1991).
- 33R. Kramer et al., The Calculation of Dose from External Photon Exposures using Reference Human Phantoms and Monte Carlo Methods: Part I: The Male (ADAM) and Female (EVA) Adult Mathematical Phantoms, GSF-Bericht-S-885 (GSF–Forschungszentrum fur Umwelt und Gesundtheit, Institut fur Strahlenschutz, Munchen, 1982).
- 34S. H. Stern et al., Handbook of Selected Tissue Doses for Fluoroscopic and Cineangiographic Examination of the Coronary Arteries, HHS publication FDA 95-8288 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, 1995).
- 35S. H. Stern et al., Handbook of Selected Tissue Doses for Fluoroscopic and Cineangiographic Examination of the Coronary Arteries (in SI units), HHS publication FDA 95-8289 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, 1995).
- 36G. Drexler et al., The Calculation of Dose from External Photon Exposure using Reference Human Phantoms and Monte Carlo Methods. Part III: Organ Doses in X-ray Diagnosis, GSF-Bericht S-1026 (GSF-Forschungszentrum fur Umwelt und Gesundtheit, Institut fur Strahlenschutz, Munchen, 1984).
- 37G. Drexler et al., The Calculation of Dose from External Photon Exposure using Reference Human Phantoms and Monte Carlo Methods. Part III: Organ Doses in X-Ray Diagnosis, GSF-Bericht 11/90 (supercedes GSF-Bericht S-1026) (GSF—Forschungszentrum fur Umwelt und Gesundtheit, Institut fur Strahlenschutz, Munchen, 1990).
- 38G. Drexler et al., Die Bestimmung von Organdosen in der Rontgendiagnostik (GSF—Forschungszentrum fur Umwelt und Gesundtheit, Institut fur Strahlenschutz, Berlin, 1993).
- 39D. G. Jones and B. F. Wall, Organ Doses from Medical X-Ray Examinations Calculated using Monte Carlo Techniques, NRPB-R186 (National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon, 1985).
- 40D. Hart, D. G. Jones, and B. F. Wall, Estimation of Effective Dose in Diagnostic Radiology from Entrance Surface Dose and Dose-Area Product Measurements, NRPB-R262 (National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon, 1994).
- 41D. Hart, D. G. Jones, and B. F. Wall, Coefficients for Estimating Effective Dose from Paediatric X-Ray Examinations, NRPB-R279 (National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon, 1996).
- 42D. Hart, D. G. Jones, and B. F. Wall, Normalised Organ Doses for Medical X-Ray Examinations Calculated using Monte Carlo Techniques, NRPB-SR262 (National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon, 1994).
- 43D. Hart, D. G. Jones, and B. F. Wall, Normalised Organ Doses for Paediatric X-Ray Examinations Calculated using Monte Carlo Techniques, NRPB-SR279 (National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon, 1996).
- 44J. C. Le Heron, XDOSE (Ministry of Health, National Radiation Laboratory, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1995).
- 45J. C. Le Heron, CHILDOSE (Ministry of Health, National Radiation Laboratory, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998).
- 46W. Huda and N. A. Gkanatsios, “Effective dose and energy imparted in diagnostic radiology,” Med. Phys. 24, 1311–1316 (1997).
- 47P. C. Shrimpton et al., “The measurement of energy imparted to patients during diagnostic x-ray examinations using the Diamentor exposure-area meter,” Phys. Med. Biol. 29, 1199–1208 (1984).
- 48N. A. Gkanatsios and W. Huda, “Computation of energy imparted in diagnostic radiology,” Med. Phys. 24, 571–579 (1997).
- 49D. G. Jones and P. C. Shrimpton, Survey of CT Practice in the UK. Part 3: Normalised Organ Doses Calculated using Monte Carlo Techniques, NRPB-R250 (National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon, 1991).
- 50M Zankl, W Panzer, and G. Drexler, The Calculation of Dose from External Photon Exposures using Reference Human Phantoms and Monte Carlo Methods. Part VI: Organ Doses from Computed Tomographic Examinations, GSF-Bericht 30/91 (GSF—Forschungszentrum fur Umwelt und Gesundtheit, Institut fur Strahlenschutz, Neuherberg, Germany, 1991).
- 51M. Zankl, W. Panzer, and G. Drexler, Tomographic Anthropomorphic Models. Part II: Organ Doses from Computed Tomographic Examinations in Paediatric Radiology, GSF-Bericht 30/93 (GSF-Forschungszentrum fur Umwelt und Gesundtheit, Institut fur Strahlenschutz, Neuherberg, Germany, 1993).
- 52C. H. McCollough, S. K. McMillan, and J. M. Kofler, Jr., “Organ dose calculations for x-ray CT: Methods and applications to clinical practice,” Med. Phys. 23, 1058 (1996).
- 53J. C. Le Heron, CTDOSE (Ministry of Health, National Radiation Laboratory, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1993).
- 54J. V. Atherton and W. Huda, “Energy imparted and effective dose in computed tomography,” Med. Phys. 23, 735–741 (1996).
- 55W. Huda et al., “An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients,” Radiology 203, 417–422 (1997).
- 56J. V. Atherton and W. Huda, “CT doses in cylindrical phantoms,” Phys. Med. Biol. 40, 891–911 (1995).
- 57W. Huda and J. V. Atherton, “Energy imparted in computed tomography,” Med. Phys. 22, 1263–1269 (1995).
- 58K. A. Jessen et al., “Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography,” Appl. Radiat. Isot. 50, 165–172 (1999).
- 59M. Rosenstein, L. W. Anderson, and G. G. Warner, Handbook of Glandular Tissue Doses in Mammography, HHS Publication FDA 85-8239 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, 1985).
- 60X. Wu, “Breast dosimetry in screen-film mammography,” in Screen film mammography: Imaging Considerations and Medical Physics Responsi-bilities, edited by G. T. Barnes and G. D. Frey (Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, 1991), pp. 159–175.
- 61X. Wu et al., “Normalized average glandular dose in Mo target-Rh filter and Rh target-Rh filter mammography”, Radiology 193, 83–89 (1994).
- 62W. T. Sobol and X. Wu, “Parametrization of mammography normalized average glandular dose tables,” Med. Phys. 24, 547–554 (1997).
- 63O. H. Suleiman, S. H. Stern, and D. C. Spelic, “Patient dosimetry activities in the United States: The nationwide evaluation of x-ray trends (NEXT) and tissue dose handbooks,” Appl. Radiat. Isot. 50, 247–259 (1999).
- 64L. N. Rothenberg and K. S. Pentlow, “CT dosimetry and radiation safety,” in Medical CT & Ultrasound: Current Technology and Applications, edited by L. W. Goldman and J. B. Fowlkes (Advanced Medical Publishing, Madison, 1995), pp. 519–556.
- 65P. C. Shrimpton et al., Survey of CT Practice in the UK. Part 2: Dosimetric Aspects, NRPB-R249 (National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon, 1991).
- 66J. C. Le Heron, “Remaining problems with effective dose?,” Phys. Med. Biol. 37, 1012–1015 (1992).
10.1088/0031-9155/37/4/016 Google Scholar
- 67D. G. Jones and P. C. Shrimpton, Normalised Organ Doses for X-Ray Computed Tomography Calculated using Monte Carlo Techniques, NRPB-SR250 (National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon, 1993).
- 68American College of Radiology, Mammography Quality Control Manual (American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 1999).
