Volume 42, Issue 4 p. 2064-2071
Radiation therapy physics

Regional radiation dose susceptibility within the parotid gland: Effects on salivary loss and recovery

Haley Clark

Haley Clark

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Allan Hovan

Allan Hovan

Oral Oncology/Dentistry, British Columbia Cancer Agency–Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Vitali Moiseenko

Vitali Moiseenko

Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California–San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093

Search for more papers by this author
Steven Thomas

Steven Thomas

Department of Medical Physics, British Columbia Cancer Agency–Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Jonn Wu

Jonn Wu

Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency–Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Stefan Reinsberg

Stefan Reinsberg

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 March 2015
Citations: 6

Abstract

Purpose:

Xerostomia is one of the most likely late toxic effects of radiotherapy treatment in patients with head-and-neck cancers. Modern treatment techniques can incorporate knowledge of complication risk into treatment plans. To this end, the authors attempt to quantify the regional radiotherapy dose-dependence of salivary output loss and recovery in a prospective study.

Methods:

Salivary output was collected from patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment for head-and-neck cancers at the BC Cancer Agency between February 2008 and May 2013. Regional dose-dependence (i.e., dose susceptibility) of loss and recovery is quantified using nonparametric (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, local linear regression) and parametric (least-sum of squares, least-median of squares) techniques.

Results:

Salivary flow recovery was seen in 79 of 102 patients considered (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon sign rank test). Output loss was strongly correlated with left- and right parotid combined dose φ = min (DL,  45 Gy) + min (DR,  45 Gy), and can be accurately predicted. Median early loss (three months) was 72% of baseline, while median overall loss (1 yr) was 56% of baseline. Fitting an exponential model to whole parotid yields dose sensitivities A3m = 0.0604 Gy−1 and A1y = 0.0379 Gy−1. Recovery was not significantly associated with dose. Hints of lateral organ sub-segment dose–response dimorphism were observed.

Conclusions:

Sub-segmentation appears to predict neither loss nor recovery with any greater precision than whole parotid mean dose, though it is not any worse. Sparing the parotid to a combined dose φ of <50 Gy is recommended for a patient to keep ≈40% of baseline function and thus avoid severe xerostomia at 12 months post-treatment. It seems unlikely that a population's mean recovery will exceed 20%–30% of baseline output at 1 yr after radiotherapy treatment using current (whole-organ based) clinical guidelines.