Volume 40, Issue 11 112502
Nuclear medicine physics

Quantitative Monte Carlo-based holmium-166 SPECT reconstruction

Mattijs Elschot

Mattijs Elschot

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht , Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Maarten L. J. Smits

Maarten L. J. Smits

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht , Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Johannes F. W. Nijsen

Johannes F. W. Nijsen

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht , Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Marnix G. E. H. Lam

Marnix G. E. H. Lam

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht , Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Bernard A. Zonnenberg

Bernard A. Zonnenberg

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht , Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Maurice A. A. J. van den Bosch

Maurice A. A. J. van den Bosch

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht , Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Max A. Viergever

Max A. Viergever

Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht , Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Hugo W. A. M. de Jong

Corresponding Author

Hugo W. A. M. de Jong

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht , Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]; Telephone: +31 88 75 53327; Fax: +31 30 25 81098.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 October 2013
Citations: 42

Abstract

Purpose:

Quantitative imaging of the radionuclide distribution is of increasing interest for microsphere radioembolization (RE) of liver malignancies, to aid treatment planning and dosimetry. For this purpose, holmium-166 (166Ho) microspheres have been developed, which can be visualized with a gamma camera. The objective of this work is to develop and evaluate a new reconstruction method for quantitative 166Ho SPECT, including Monte Carlo-based modeling of photon contributions from the full energy spectrum.

Methods:

A fast Monte Carlo (MC) simulator was developed for simulation of166Ho projection images and incorporated in a statistical reconstruction algorithm (SPECT-fMC). Photon scatter and attenuation for all photons sampled from the full 166Ho energy spectrum were modeled during reconstruction by Monte Carlo simulations. The energy- and distance-dependent collimator-detector response was modeled using precalculated convolution kernels. Phantom experiments were performed to quantitatively evaluate image contrast, image noise, count errors, and activity recovery coefficients (ARCs) of SPECT-fMC in comparison with those of an energy window-based method for correction of down-scattered high-energy photons (SPECT-DSW) and a previously presented hybrid method that combines MC simulation of photopeak scatter with energy window-based estimation of down-scattered high-energy contributions (SPECT-ppMC+DSW). Additionally, the impact of SPECT-fMC on whole-body recovered activities (Aest) and estimated radiation absorbed doses was evaluated using clinical SPECT data of six 166Ho RE patients.

Results:

At the same noise level, SPECT-fMC images showed substantially higher contrast than SPECT-DSW and SPECT-ppMC+DSW in spheres ≥17 mm in diameter. The count error was reduced from 29% (SPECT-DSW) and 25% (SPECT-ppMC+DSW) to 12% (SPECT-fMC). ARCs in five spherical volumes of 1.96–106.21 ml were improved from 32%–63% (SPECT-DSW) and 50%–80% (SPECT-ppMC+DSW) to 76%–103% (SPECT-fMC). Furthermore, SPECT-fMC recovered whole-body activities were most accurate (Aest = 1.06 × A − 5.90 MBq, R2 = 0.97) and SPECT-fMC tumor absorbed doses were significantly higher than with SPECT-DSW (p = 0.031) and SPECT-ppMC+DSW (p = 0.031).

Conclusions:

The quantitative accuracy of166Ho SPECT is improved by Monte Carlo-based modeling of the image degrading factors. Consequently, the proposed reconstruction method enables accurate estimation of the radiation absorbed dose in clinical practice.