Radiation imaging physics

Calculation of x-ray spectra emerging from an x-ray tube. Part II. X-ray production and filtration in x-ray targets

Gavin G. Poludniowski

Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom

Electronic mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

Gavin G. Poludniowski,

Gavin G. Poludniowski

Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom

Electronic mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 21 May 2007

https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2734726

Citations: 210

Share a link

Email
Facebook
x
LinkedIn
Reddit
Wechat
Bluesky

Abstract

A new approach to the calculation of the x-ray spectrum emerging from an x-ray tube is proposed. Theoretical results for the bremsstrahlung cross section appearing in the literature are summarized. Four different treatments of electron penetration, based on the work presented in Part I, are then used to generate bremsstrahlung spectra. These spectra are compared to experimental data at 50, 80 and $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0001$ tube potentials. The most sophisticated treatment of electron penetration was required to obtain good agreement. With this treatment both the National Institute of Standards and Technology bremsstrahlung cross sections, based on accurate partial wave calculations, and the Bethe-Heitler cross section [H. A. Bethe and W. Heitler, Proc R. Soc. London, Ser. A. 146, 83–112 (1934)] corrected by a modified Elwert factor [G. Elwert, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 426, 178–208 (1939)], provided good agreement to measured data. An approximate treatment of the characteristic spectrum is suggested. The dependencies of the bremsstrahlung and characteristic outputs of an x-ray tube on tube potential are compared to experimentally derived data for 70– $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0002$ potentials. Agreement is to within a few percent of the total output over the entire range. The spectral predictions of the semiempirical models of Birch and Marshall [R. Birch and M. Marshall, Phys. Med. Biol. 24, 505–513 (1979)] (IPEM Report 78) and of Tucker et al. [D. M. Tucker, G. T. Barnes, and D. P. Chakraborty, Med. Phys. 18, 211–218 (1991).] are also assessed. The predictions of Tucker et al. are very close to the model developed here. The predictions of IPEM Report 78 are similar, but consistently harder for the range of tube potentials examined $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0003$ ). Unlike the semiempirical models, the model proposed here requires the introduction of no empirical and unphysical parameters in the differential bremsstrahlung cross section, bar an overall normalization factor which is close to unity.

REFERENCES

1H. A. Kramers, “On the theory of x-ray absorption and of the continuous x-ray spectrum,” Philos. Mag. 46, 836–871 (1923).
10.1080/14786442308565244
CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar
2H. Kuhlenkampff, “Über das kontinuierliche Röntgenspektrum,” Ann. Phys. 374, 548–596 (1922).
10.1002/andp.19223742303
Google Scholar
3H. Kuhlenkampff and L. Schmidt, “Die energieverteilung im spektrum der röntgen-bremsstrahlung,” Ann. Phys. 435, 494–512 (1943).
10.1002/andp.19434350610
Google Scholar
4H. A. Bethe and W. Heitler, “On the stopping of fast particles and the creation of positive electrons,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 146, 83–112 (1934).
10.1098/rspa.1934.0140
CASGoogle Scholar
5M. H. Unsworth and J. R. Greening, “Theoretical continuous and L-characteristic x-ray spectra for tungsten target tubes operated at $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0231$ ,” Phys. Med. Biol. 15, 621–630 (1970).
10.1088/0031-9155/15/4/001
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
6B. W. Soole, “A method of x-ray attenuation analysis for approximating the intensity distribution at its point of origin of bremsstrahlung excited in a thick target by incident electrons of constant medium energy,” Phys. Med. Biol. 21, 369–389 (1976).
10.1088/0031-9155/21/3/003
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
7B. W. Soole, “The effect of target absorption on the attenuation characteristics of bremsstrahlung generated at constant medium potentials,” Phys. Med. Biol. 22, 187–207 (1977).
10.1088/0031-9155/22/2/001
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
8R. Birch and M. Marshall, “Computation of bremsstrahlung x-ray spectra and comparison with spectra measured with a $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0232$ detector,” Phys. Med. Biol. 24, 505–517 (1979).
10.1088/0031-9155/24/3/002
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
9W. J. Iles, “ The computation of bremsstrahlung x-ray spectra over an energy range $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0233$ to $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0234$ ,” Report No. NRPB-R204 (National Radiation Protection Board, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, 1987).
Google Scholar
10D. M. Tucker, G. T. Barnes, and D. P. Chakraborty, “Semiempirical model for generating tungsten target x-ray spectra,” Med. Phys. 18, 211–218 (1991).
10.1118/1.596709
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
11R. D. Evans, “ Radiative collisions of electrons with atomic nuclei,” in The Atomic Nucleus (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1955), pp. 601–631.
Google Scholar
12M. Bhat, J. Pattison, G. Bibbo, and M. Caon, “Off-axis x-ray spectra: A comparison of Monte Carlo simulated and computed x-ray spectra with measured spectra,” Med. Phys. 26, 303–309 (1999).
10.1118/1.598517
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
13M. Bhat, J. Pattison, G. Bibbo, and M. Caon, “Diagnostic x-ray spectra: A comparison of spectra generated by different computational methods with a measured spectrum,” Med. Phys. 25, 114–120 (1998).
10.1118/1.598170
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
14P. Meyer, E. Buffard, L. Mertz, C. Kennel, A. Constantinesco, and P. Siffert, “Evaluation of the use of six diagnostic x-ray spectra computer codes,” Br. J. Radiol. 77, 224–230 (2004).
10.1259/bjr/32409995
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
15M. R. Ay, S. Sarkar, M. Shahriari, D. Sardari, and H. Zaidi, “Assessment of different computational models for generation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography,” Med. Phys. 32, 1660–1675 (2005).
10.1118/1.1906126
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
16K. Cranley, B. J. Gilmore, G. W. A. Fogarty, and L. Deponds, “ Catalogue of diagnostic x-ray spectra and other data,” IPEM Report No. 78 (The Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, York, 1997).
Web of Science®Google Scholar
17J. M. Boone and J. A. Seibert, “An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0235$ ,” Med. Phys. 24, 1661–1670 (1997).
10.1118/1.597953
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
18J. H. Siewerdsen, A. M. Waese, D. J. Moseley, S. Richard, and D. A. Jaffray, “Spektr: A computational tool for x-ray spectral analysis and imaging system optimization,” Med. Phys. 31, 3057–3067 (2004).
10.1118/1.1758350
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
19J. P. Bissonnette and L. J. Schreiner, “A comparison of semiempirical models for generating tungsten target x-ray spectra,” Med. Phys. 19, 579–582 (1992).
10.1118/1.596848
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
20M. M. Blough, R. G. Waggener, W. H. Payne, and J. A. Terry, “Calculated mammographic spectra confirmed with attenuation curves for molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten targets,” Med. Phys. 25, 1605–1612 (1998).
10.1118/1.598340
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
21E. Mainegra-Hing and I. Kawrakow, “Efficient x-ray tube simulations,” Med. Phys. 373(8), 2683–2690 (2006).
10.1118/1.2219331
Web of Science®Google Scholar
22G. G. Poludniowski and P. M. Evans, “ Calculation of x-ray spectra emerging from an x-ray tube; Part I: Electron penetration characteristics in x-ray targets,” Med. Phys. (2007).
Google Scholar
23W. Heitler, The Quantum Theory of Radiation, 3rd ed. (Clarendon, Oxford, 1954).
Google Scholar
24R. Whiddington, “The transmission of cathode rays through matter,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 86, 360–370 (1912).
10.1098/rspa.1912.0028
Web of Science®Google Scholar
25R. J. Gould, Electro-Magnetic Processes (Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2006).
Google Scholar
26F. Sauter, “Über die Bremsstrahlung schneller Elektronen,” Ann. Phys. 412, 404–412 (1934).
10.1002/andp.19344120405
Google Scholar
27W. Heitler, The Quantum Theory of Radiation, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1949).
Google Scholar
28G. Elwert, “Verschärfte berechnung von intensität und polarisation im kontinuierlichen röntgenspektrum,” Ann. Phys. 426, 178–208 (1939).
10.1002/andp.19394260206
Google Scholar
29G. Elwert and E. Haug, “Calculation of bremsstrahlung cross sections with Sommerfeld-Maue eigenfunctions,” Phys. Rev. 183, 90–105 (1969).
10.1103/PhysRev.183.90
CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar
30B. Rudraswamy, K. Gopala, P. Venkataramaiah, and H. Sanjeeviah, “External bremsstrahlung spectra excited by $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0236$ beta particles in thick targets,” J. Phys. G 10, 1579–1586 (1984).
10.1088/0305-4616/10/11/014
CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar
31N. B. Avdonina and R. H. Pratt, “Bremsstrahlung spectra from atoms and ions at low relativistic energies,” J. Phys. B 32, 4261–4276 (1999).
10.1088/0953-4075/32/17/310
CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar
32S. M. Seltzer and M. J. Berger, “Bremsstrahlung energy spectra from electrons with kinetic energy $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0237$ to $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0238$ incident on screened nuclei and orbital electrons of neutral atoms with $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0239$ ,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 35, 345–418 (1986).
10.1016/0092-640X(86)90014-8
CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar
33R. H. Pratt, H. K. Tseng, C. M. Lee, L. Kissel, C. MacCallum, and M. Riley, “Bremsstrahlung energy spectra from electrons of kinetic energy $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0240$ incident on neutral atoms $urn:x-wiley:00942405:media:mp4726:mp4726-math-0241$ ,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 20, 175–209 (1977).
10.1016/0092-640X(77)90045-6
CASGoogle Scholar
34F. Verhaegen, A. E. Nahum, P. S. Van de, and Y. Namito, “Monte Carlo modeling of radiotherapy kV x-ray units,” Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 1767–1789 (1999).
10.1088/0031-9155/44/7/315
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
35N. A. Dyson, X-rays in Atomic and Nuclear Physics (Longman Group Limited, London, 1973).
Google Scholar
36M. J. Berger, J. H. Hubbell, S. M. Seltzer, J. Chang, J. S. Coursey, R. Sukumar, and D. S. Zucker, “ XCOM: Photon Cross Section Database (version 1.3),” (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 2005). Online available: http://physics.nist.gov/xcom (May 10, 2007).
Google Scholar
37T. R. Fewell, R. E. Shuping, and K. R. Hawkins, Handbook of Computed Tomography X-Ray Spectra, HHS Publication (FDA) 81-862 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1981).
Google Scholar
38R. Birch, “The spectrum and intensity of extra-focal(off-focus) radiation,” Br. J. Radiol. 49, 951–955 (1976).
10.1259/0007-1285-49-587-951
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
39F. M. di Sopra, P. Keall, and W. Beckham, “An analytical model of a kilovoltage beam phase space,” Med. Phys. 26, 2000–2006 (1999).
10.1118/1.598705
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar