Volume 46, Issue 12 p. 5444-5453
Research Article

Novel acoustic coupling bath using magnetite nanoparticles for MR-guided transcranial focused ultrasound surgery

Steven P. Allen

Corresponding Author

Steven P. Allen

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]; Telephone: 434-924-5101.

Search for more papers by this author
Tom Steeves

Tom Steeves

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Austin Fergusson

Austin Fergusson

Graduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dave Moore

Dave Moore

The Focused Ultrasound Foundation, Charlottesville, VA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Richey M Davis

Richey M Davis

Department of Chemical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Eli Vlaisialjevich

Eli Vlaisialjevich

Graduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Craig H. Meyer

Craig H. Meyer

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 October 2019
Citations: 9

Abstract

Purpose

Acoustic coupling baths, nominally composed of degassed water, play important roles during transcranial focused ultrasound surgery. However, this large water bolus also degrades the quality of intraoperative magnetic resonance (MR) guidance imaging. In this study, we test the feasibility of using dilute, aqueous magnetite nanoparticle suspensions to suppress these image degradations while preserving acoustic compatibility. We examine the effects of these suspensions on metrics of image quality and acoustic compatibility for two types of transcranial focused ultrasound insonation regimes: low-duty cycle histotripsy procedures and high-duty cycle thermal ablation procedures.

Methods

Magnetic resonance guidance imaging was used to monitor thermal ablations of in vitro gel targets using a coupling bath composed of various concentrations of aqueous, suspended, magnetite nanoparticles in a clinical transcranial transducer under stationary and flowing conditions. Thermal deposition was monitored using MR thermometry simultaneous to insonation. Then, using normal degassed water as a coupling bath, various concentrations of aqueous, suspended, magnetite nanoparticles were placed at the center of this same transducer and insonated using high-duty cycle pulsing parameters. Passive cavitation detectors recorded cavitation emissions, which were then used to estimate the relative number of cavitation events per insonation (cavitation duty cycle) and the cavitation dose estimates of each nanoparticle concentration. Finally, the nanoparticle mixtures were exposed to low-duty cycle, histotripsy pulses. Passive cavitation detectors monitored cavitation emissions, which were used to estimate cavitation threshold pressures.

Results

The nanoparticles reduced the MR signal of the coupling bath by 90% in T2- and T2*-weighted images and also removed almost all imaging artifacts caused by coupling bath motion. The coupling baths caused <5% changes in peak temperature change achieved during sonication, as observed via MR thermometry. At low duty cycle insonations, the nanoparticles decreased the cavitation threshold pressure by about 15 ± 7% in a manner uncorrelated with nanoparticle concentration. At high duty cycle insonations, the 0.5 cavitation duty cycle acoustic power threshold varied linearly with nanoparticle concentration.

Conclusions

Dilute aqueous magnetite nanoparticle suspensions effectively reduced MR imaging artifacts caused by the acoustic coupling bath. They also attenuated acoustic power deposition by <5%. For low duty cycle insonation regimes, the nanoparticles decreased the cavitation threshold by 15 ± 7%. However, for high-duty cycle regimes, the nanoparticles decreased the threshold for cavitation in proportion to nanoparticle concentration.

Conflict of Interest

Author Eli Vlaisavljevich has a consulting relationship with HistoSonics, Inc.